tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8501956666581132164.post8849222752837338730..comments2023-10-16T03:46:07.987-07:00Comments on Google App Engine Blog: Python 2.5, thanks for the good timesFred Sauer, Developer Advocatehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11839928976887669200noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8501956666581132164.post-19562923197765909742013-05-07T20:30:44.213-07:002013-05-07T20:30:44.213-07:00Python 2.5 was definitely a very handy version and...Python 2.5 was definitely a very handy version and like everything else it has to go out some day. There's a fair bit of compatibility between 2.5 and 2.7 and it seems worth the shift. Less runtime is sure to be one big bonus.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18378185300630463222noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8501956666581132164.post-41878662857011577542013-03-16T19:48:29.489-07:002013-03-16T19:48:29.489-07:00+Sarkis Dallakian I'm pretty sure that thread...+Sarkis Dallakian I'm pretty sure that thread-safe mode requires you to use WSGI. But I think you can still use Python 2.7 with CGI (without thread-safe mode).Nathan Youngmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08773230031078679153noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8501956666581132164.post-42629854464134492552013-03-14T21:10:01.337-07:002013-03-14T21:10:01.337-07:00It seems that Python 2.7 and threadsafe are not su...It seems that Python 2.7 and threadsafe are not supported in the dev_appserver. I followed migration guide and getting <i>Fatal error when loading application configuration:<br />threadsafe cannot be enabled with CGI handler</i>. How are we supposed to test our app with Python 2.7 to ensure backward compatibility?Sargishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01730048467387998912noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8501956666581132164.post-73163997710740381252013-03-12T19:20:46.413-07:002013-03-12T19:20:46.413-07:00What doesn't migrate so easily is old apps on ...What doesn't migrate so easily is old apps on app-engine-patch, itself deprecated. Moreover, I've tried a couple of times to sort through the mess that is Django on app engine.<br /><br />The only thing to do is rewrite our app on something else (e.g., webapp2), but that requires more time than I've had to devote.<br />DFhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10928712770628693547noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8501956666581132164.post-78092935323775481152013-03-11T23:52:25.946-07:002013-03-11T23:52:25.946-07:00I think present time 90% developer used Python 2....I think present time 90% developer used Python 2.5 for consider migrating as soon as possible. One thing about these notices is they only say the feature will be deprecated in accordance with their stated policy.Software/setuphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18209062500433288078noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8501956666581132164.post-45038852501111881072013-03-11T00:19:00.709-07:002013-03-11T00:19:00.709-07:00One step closer to adding Python 3.x support? http...One step closer to adding Python 3.x support? https://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=909<br /><br />Heroku's buildpack already supports it. https://github.com/heroku/heroku-buildpack-pythonNathan Youngmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08773230031078679153noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8501956666581132164.post-73163903169939958482013-03-08T23:59:48.827-08:002013-03-08T23:59:48.827-08:00One thing I really hate about these notices is the...One thing I really hate about these notices is they only say the feature will be deprecated in accordance with their stated policy. Don't make me have to look it up and do the math. Just state plainly in the post when the fricken deprecation date is. Sheesh.TheBashar99https://www.blogger.com/profile/13234546920179655569noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8501956666581132164.post-5694613326452704732013-03-08T21:57:07.918-08:002013-03-08T21:57:07.918-08:00When are you planning to support Python 3?
It bec...When are you planning to support Python 3?<br /><br />It became available the very same year you started up, but still no support!Matt Iversenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02586462752511873151noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8501956666581132164.post-52137540404848684162013-03-08T11:51:42.245-08:002013-03-08T11:51:42.245-08:00Seems reasonable, given the degree of compatibilit...Seems reasonable, given the degree of compatibility between 2.5 and 2.7.<br /><br />I'm sure that one less runtime makes your lives easier.<br /><br />Speaking of which, would love to see you introduce a more general purpose runtime, e.g. using something like the technology you use with Chrome's NaCl (I believe this is LLVM).Tomhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17134137228523694876noreply@blogger.com